'Oh, so that's who Richard Morris is..." Lord Hattersley on The Daily Politics

'An influential activist' - The Guardian

'Iain Dale, without the self loathing' - Matthew Fox in The New Statesman

'
You are a tinker...' - Tim Farron

Tuesday, 7 August 2012

Cameron's decision to drop Lords reform will test the coalition like never before

Posted this last Friday in The New Statesman. 4 days later, I'm feeling I had it pretty much on the money...

Do pop over there to see the comments...


So now we know. The reported abandonment of Lords Reform means the government’s legislative programme is being run, not by the Prime Minister, but by a group of 100 or so Conservative backbenchers who henceforth will be calling the shots. It’s quite a moment.
The received wisdom seems to be that that "no Lords Reform means similarly no boundary changes", there’s a minor sulk for a day or so and then everyone moves on.
This is quite wrong. From a Lib Dem perspective, the two great constitutional changes we wanted to achieve in government will have failed. There will have to be some mighty great bits of compensation in return – and it’s unlikely the Tories will deliver. Can anyone see Osborne – now guaranteed to be Chancellor until the next election according to the PM yesterday – agreeing to a radical green agenda? Ditto on delivering root and branch banking reform, the so-called "Vickers Plus" plan apparently favoured by Vince. Self-interest means neither the Labour or Conservative leadership will show any great enthusiasm for Party Funding reform. And even if they did, those emboldened Tory backbenchers now know they can stop anything they don’t like in its tracks.
But neither is the status quo acceptable to grassroots Lib Dems. Expect fireworks at the Brighton conference where Lib Dem members will be demanding Nick Clegg negotiates the earth in return for this latest Conservative debacle – but which he knows he cannot deliver because his Tory opposite number is holed below the water line.
Nick’s only power will be similarly to say a firm "No" to anything we find even vaguely uncomfortable going forward. The snooping bill should be firmly in his sights. But more than that, he needs to stop any of the legislation that the Tory right are itching to start pushing – attempts to abandon the European Convention of Human Rights and an EU referendum are two obvious areas in which Nick is more likely to be able to control Tory backbenchers than the PM. There’s an irony there.
And so we reach an impasse in which the sole government agenda item will become the centrepiece of the coalition agreement – reducing the deficit. And even there a fight is brewing as Vince pushes for Plan B and Osborne looks to cut Welfare. Another impasse looms.
And all the time the pressure builds. Tory backbenchers will be stretching their muscles, Lib Dem grass roots will be pushing right back. Eventually something is going to give. The only question is which is the weakest spot – Cameron’s hold on his party or the glue that binds the coalition?
One of them is going to crack first. And then the fun really starts.

Friday, 3 August 2012

Out of focus. Poorly framed. Slightly washed out.

...and yet still probably the best picture you'll ever see.

Lovely.


h/t to @charlstonm & @philipnormal

Update: Oh no! Apparently it's a photoshop. Makes me quite sad.

Wednesday, 1 August 2012

BoJo as you've never seen him before. It's better than you think:




With grateful thanks to...


Just a few hours left to vote in my 'which party will ditch its leader first' poll. Just click the name in the voting buttons on the top right. If you are viewing this on a mobile, scroll down to the bottom of the page, click 'view web version' and the poll will become visible top right.

Go on, you know you want to.

Poll closes 2 pm ish


An update to all those cabinet shuffle rumours.

All changes from earlier post are in red. Remember the rules. Names are put against position if

1. I read that the incumbent is staying in post
2. I read a person is tipped to get that job
3. No name against a position means I've not heard the incumbent is staying nor any other name been mentioned


It's all go isn't it?


Prime Minister

David Cameron

Deputy PM

Nick Clegg

Chancellor of the Exchequer

George Osborne
Vince Cable
William Hague
John Redwood
Philip Hammond
Michael Gove
Theresa May

Foreign Secretary

William Hague
George Osborne

Home Secretary

Theresa May
Michael Gove
Chris Grayling

Education

Michael Gove
Liz Truss

Health

Andrew Lansley
Ken Clarke
Jeremy Hunt
David Laws

Chief Secretary

Justice

Nick Herbert
Theresa May
Theresa Villiers
Iain Duncan Smith

Scottish Secretary

Jo Swinson
Alastair Carmichael


Welsh Secretary

Cheryl Gillan
David Jones


Northern Ireland


Business

Andrew Mitchell
David Laws
Danny Alexander

Environment

Baroness Warsi
Maria Miller

Energy

Ed Davey

House of Lords

Lord Howard

Minister without Portfolio (Chair of Tory Party)

Grant Shapps
Michael Fallon
Michael Gove
Jeremy Hunt
Andrew Mitchell

Defence

Philip Hammond

Work & Pensions

Iain Duncan Smith

Communities

Transport

Andrew Mitchell
Theresa Villiers
Chris Grayling

International Development

Baroness Warsi

DCMS

Jeremy Hunt
Justine Greening
Ed Vaizey


And while we’re at it – more speculation. People I have seen tipped to be leave (there’s a major surprise in there but I have read it so feel I must be comprehensive) or be promoted to the cabinet.

Tipped to leave

Ken Clarke
Caroline Spelman
Jeremy Hunt
Baroness Warsi
Andrew Lansley
Vince Cable (that’s the surprise)
Cheryl Gillan


Tipped to be Promoted

Grant Shapps
Maria Miller
Chris Grayling
David Laws
Jo Swinson
Alistair Carmichael
Greg Clark
Lynn Featherstone
Andrea Leadsom
Margot James
Anna Soubry
Claire Perry
Nicky Morgan
Harriet Baldwin
Theresa Villiers
Mark Harper
Nick Herbert
Ed Vaizey
Lord Howard
Michael Fallon
David Jones
Liz Truss
John Redwood

And finally – if you haven’t heard the rumour – is DCMS about to be binned altogether?